We've dropped some questions of the CSUQ questionnaire, for example those on error handling, because they didn't really apply to our prototype. Also our main focus is still the user interviews. We didn't want to bother our test persons with a large questionnaire. So we used the CSUQ questionnaire as a source of inspiration and added some questions of our own (e.g. desing choices). We didn't intend to do a full-blown questionnaire.
- General
- Age, category
- Information stream and sources
- Usefullness of the application
- 3 most negative, 3 most positive aspects
- This system has all the functions and capabilities I expect it to have
- Comfort of use, interface and learnability
- It was simple to use this system
- The organization of information on the system screens is clear
- The interface of this system is pleasant
- It was easy to learn to use this system
- I believe I became productive quickly using this system
- Efficiency en effectivity
- I can effectively complete my work using this system
- I am able to complete my work quickly using this system
- I am able to efficiently complete my work using this system
- Design choices: What do you think is the most usefull?
- Priority & tags bar on the bottom or top of the screen?
- Priority & tags bar permanent or popup?
- Drop down menu only on hovering/clicking or fixed?
- Is 'ToDo' a clear description?
- Is the number and size of the messages on the screen enough?
- Do the icons offer an added value?
- Are the time-categories clear? Do you need more of them or less?
- Is the desktop idea clear?
That looks fine - would be useful to know what exactly you changed to CSUQ and why though...
ReplyDeleteis it not hard for a user to know how efficient he can go through his work based only on a paper prototype?
ReplyDeleteWe understand by efficiency how many clicks the user do to perform the task. So if we explain it this way to the user it can still be seen in paper prototype phase.
Delete